IQ tests are a way of trying to measure
someone’s intelligence. They test skills
such as the ability to use numbers, or to recognise similarities between words. After doing the test, you are given a
score. The human average is set at 100,
so a score of lower than 100 suggests a lower than average intelligence, a
score of more than 100 a higher than average intelligence.
But average human IQ scores have changed
over time. I read an article recently
which talked about how people’s IQ scores have changed over the last 100 years. It said that if people who took the test in
the past were judged against today’s average IQ, they would be considered to
have lower than average intelligence.
From the 1920s to the 1990s, the average human IQ was increasing by
about 3 points every ten years. If an IQ
test really is a good measure of your intelligence, then you would look very
smart to almost everyone around you if you could go back to 1920 in a time
machine.
The article also said, however, that IQ
scores stopped going up in the 1990s, and in some places have started to go
down. It made me wonder what changed in
the 1990s to make everyone stupider?
Could it have been calculators? In the 1980s, people had to use their brain
to make calculations. Increasingly from
the 1990s, people just had to push some buttons.
Could it have been the internet? Did we stop bothering to learn things because
we thought, “I can always ask Google later”?
Could it have been tamagotchi, Pokemon, or the
Spice Girls? I’m not quite sure why, but
I just have the feeling that these things might have been making the world
stupider.
I talked about this topic with one of my
Japanese friends. To begin the
conversation, I asked her if she knew anything about IQ tests.
“Ah, IQ tests. You mean, like, Einstein had a high IQ,
right?”
“Right,” I said. “I’m sure Einstein must have had a very high
score, since he was so intelligent.”
“But then again, maybe his intelligence
balanced itself out,” she said. “Like,
maybe he was a genius in maths, but he couldn’t do simple things, such as put
on matching socks.”
“I don’t think IQ tests have a question
about whether your socks are matching,” I said.
I think it is a nice idea. To give ordinary people a chance to keep pace
with great scientists like Einstein, the questions should be tweaked a little:
Q1
1, 3, 6, 10. What is the next number in the sequence?
Q2
On your left foot is a black sock. What coloured sock should be on your right
foot?
Q3
Which two words have the same meaning?
Tiny; faded; large; true; big
Q4
Q4
You have a slice of toast for
breakfast. Which of these things should
you spread on it?:
Ice-cream; dynamite; butter; caviar
How did you do? Are you as smart as Einstein?
Vocabulary:
for two things to balance out – for two
opposite things to be roughly equal in size, power etc., or for the strength of
two things to match and cancel each other
ordinary – not unusual
to tweak something – to change something
just slightly
No comments:
Post a Comment